You would think the yabos at MSNBC would figure out they are the laughingstock of Cable News, but I guess no one has told them yet. Now they are all a twitter about Gov. Palin jotting down some talking points on her hand. She wrote down a few topics she wanted to speak about while giving a speech at the Tea Party Convention held this past weekend. What has got the MSNBC goobers all upset is that she wrote them on the palm of her hand:

First Andrea Mitchell mocked Gov. Palin on MSNBC's "Morning Joe":

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ms. Mitchell is what passes for a Professional Journalist at MSNBC. is it any wonder their ratings are sinking fast. I wonder if Andrea feels a bit of envy for Gov. Palin's Popularity? Maybe she acts out in an effort to garner some attention herself. Lets help her out!

Hey Andrea here is a Palm Message just for you going out live on the internet for all to see:

Next on our hit parade is Chrissy Matthews. You may remember him for his gushing praise for POTUS Obama's speaking abilities when he said:

"I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often….And that is an objective assessment.”

Sure Chris whatever you say dude. Anyhow back to the point, Chirs had a go at Gov. Palin on his show Hardball. (yeah his show is still on the air even though he frequently ranks dead last in the Cable News Network ratings...)

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Poor Chris, I think he is suffering from the same malady affecting poor Andrea Mitchell. He really is looking for something to spark some ratings maybe we can help him out with his own Hand-Gate story. OK Chris here is a plug for you also, going out live on the Internet for all to see:

Nuff Said...

Next Argument...

Mad Dawgg

UPDATE!

And the hits keep coming!

Now White House Press Secretary Robert "Baghdad Bob" Gibbs:

has made his own foray into Hand-Gate:

Well now, Bob must have got the word about Andrea and Chrissy getting their own Hand-gate Palm messages. He must want a little Hand-Gate Lovin' too!

So here is one just for you Bob:

Nuff Said...

Next Argument...

Mad Dawgg

Must see video:

Version one:

version two:

Are you paying attention now? ver. 2

For the first time in my life I fear my government...

On April 30th ABC News aired a news piece about waterboarding. This ordinarily would be nothing more than left wing propaganda aired to promote a political position. (Left wing bias in the big 3 networks is a matter of fact now not conjecture. If you don’t believe me just do an Internet search for polls taken on the subject.)

Sorry didn’t mean to get sidetracked OK back to ABC. They aired a piece that supposedly reveals… well honestly it does not really matter what they revealed. In the process of airing their story they revealed the names and faces of two men who the CIA hired to consult on the issue of Waterboarding and using it as a technique to gain information from terrorists. Some of the information that was gained helped us stop another 9/11 type attack planned for Los Angeles. (Meaning flying a plane or planes into a tall building to collapse it and kill as many people as possible.)

We can argue all day about whether waterboarding is torture or if it leaves psychological damage. Honestly I don’t care, and this idea that it might harm their psyche always gives me a giggle. The guys they waterboarded helped plan and execute the 9/11 attack. In my book they are as screwed up psychologically as one can get, they are mass murderers! So if they get a little upset because someone pours water down their throat till they think they are going to die, well tough !

Sorry I strayed from the point again, back to the traitors I mean the reporters at ABC. The piece that ABC aired had no need to mention the names or show the faces of these two men. The issue they were reporting did not require it at all. ABC could’ve easily blurred their faces and stated they were doing so to protect their identities. But instead they chose to ambush them with a "gotcha maneuver” and now these two men (and their families) are wide open to retaliation by any terrorist group that wants to get them.

Some of you may think this is justice. Well again I am not going to argue such. Like I stated earlier I am just not upset about the discomfort of people who killed 3 thousand plus American civilians. But those of you who are all upset about waterboarding and other means that were used to stop another attack should realize ABC has now outed people who were working for the US government to protect our nation.

Ask yourself this, if the US government came to you for help to hinder terrorists would you risk it now? Would you worry that after another election the new President would produce memos that would lead to revealing your identity to the terrorists making you and your family a target? I know I would not. President Obama has done some pretty ignorant things since he took office but this issue is the takes the cake. He has aided the terrorists in many ways and he has demoralized those in the security agencies that are tasked with protecting our country. And now ABC has jumped on the band wagon and outed people who have been charged with no crimes or misdeeds.

This is a pure political hit piece to drum up support for the President’s stupid moves he has made in regards to the safety of our nation. ABC needs to realize they have crossed the line. I have no doubt that if they had done such a deed while Harry Truman was in office they would be arrested and charged with treason. But in this day and age the leftwing zealots who run our country nod and smile with approval at ABC for doing such.

One other thing you should know ABC is guilty of several things by airing this piece not the least of which is hypocrisy. ABC reported extensively on the Valerie Plame affair… (You remember her right? The supposed undercover CIA agent who handed out business cards that showed she worked for the CIA and also told her neighbors and friends where she worked.) Anyhow they reported extensively on the supposed outing of “Secret Agent” Plame by the Bush administration. Their coverage was full of calls for impeachment and investigations for doing such a dastardly deed. Then they turn around and reveal the names and faces and work places of two men who were totally unknown to the public at large and made them targets for the bad guys. BTW the three reporters who produced the story are: BRIAN ROSS, MATTHEW COLE, and JOSEPH RHEE.

I believe the word here is hypocrisy. AND, I have had enough. I could care less if ABCNBCCBS reports with breathless glee the latest leftwing bullshit policy that Washington is going to foist on the Nation. But I do care when they endanger the lives of Americans just to prop up the poll numbers of the President. So, I’ve been working these last couple days gathering up contact info for all of ABC’s sponsors. And I’m asking you to contact any or all of them and express your displeasure at ABC’s treasonous acts.

Please be courteous when you contact these sponsors and express your displeasure they choose to advertise with a group who has outed American Citizens who helped stop another attack on our nation and made them targets for any and all terrorist organizations.

Here is the list of sponsors for ABC News:

Tylenol: 1-888-466-8746 or you can email them at this link: Tylenol

Citi.com: 1-800-374-9700 Email them here Citi.com

American Cancer Society: 1-800-227-2345 or email them here: A.C.S.

NatCity: 1-800-628-8151 or email them here: NatCity

AT&T 1-800-873-9680 (I can't find an email for them)

Red Lobster 1-800-562-7837 or email them here: Redlobster.com

Preen 1-800-233-1067 or email them here: preen.com

1-800-flowers.com: 1-800-356-9377 or email them here: flower.com

FORD: 1-800-392-3673 or email them here: Ford Advertising

SafeAute.com 1-800-723-3288 Email them at: CSD@SafeAuto.com

So there you have it, if you want to show ABC it’s wrong to play politics with American Lives then hit them where it really hurts. In the wallet! Contact any and all of the above sponsors and voice your displeasure!

nuff said...

next subject...

Mad Dawgg

If case you missed it (and believe me the MSM is trying very hard to downplay this) One of the planes used as Air force One (yeah they got backups) did a low altitude fly-by of Ground Zero New York on April 27th 2009 at about 10:00 AM.

When you read the above it doesn’t really excite anyone. Sounds routine, like such incidents happen everyday and no big deal, right?

The problem is that words can’t really give the full impact of what happened. Luckily we live in the modern age where video cameras are everywhere and as such this incident was captured by alert New Yorkers all over the city.

Here is a sampling of the footage:

This next one is from Skynews:

This next one is from WSJ.com:

This next one is from NYPOST.com

Ok so no harm no foul right? Well not really, I saved the best (or more precisely the worst) for last:

Now realize this is the reaction of folks that were in the vicinity of the available video cameras. One has to ask how many people panicked that were not recorded. How many were holding their breath hoping that this was just a mistake and that military jet wasn’t assigned to shoot down that plane before it smashed into another tall building in New York. Oh yeah, in case you forgot, 8 years ago this happened in New York, twice in one day.

To refresh your memory:

So, we have an incident where the President’s plane does a low level flyover in a City that has been hit twice with large jet airliners in order to kill as many people as possible.

Here are some points to consider:

The White House claims this was done for a “Photo Op” to get beauty shots of Air Force One flying close to landmarks also its been reported that this “Photo Op” cost the US taxpayers almost $400,000.00. (Ok hasn’t anyone at the White House heard of Photoshop? The pro version is like 2000 bucks or less, for that kind of money you could hire 4 people to work for a year at photoshoping Air Force One into every known land mark in the world, and still have $200,000 bucks left to subvert the Constitution in new and interesting ways.)

The White house claims the military jet escorts were for security. (OK why was there a need for security? Was there someone on board that needed protecting? If so why was there a need to buzz down town New York? How would the jets protect Air Force One? Shoot down planes that got too close? When such happens where do those fiery scraps of destroyed plane land? I am sure there are a large number of New Yorkers who would like to know that bit of info! If security was a concern then why tempt fate for a “Photo Op”? Like I said before Photoshop Pro is less than 2000 bucks. I understand the need for security when someone is on board and flying on government business but this was a friggin' “Photo Op” for Christ sake!)

Its being reported by ABC news that “Federal officials knew that sending two fighter jets and Air Force one to buzz ground zero and Lady Liberty might set off nightmarish fears of a 9/11 replay, but they still ordered the photo-op kept secret from the public.”

Why, what purpose does this serve? If it’s just a “Photo Op” then why not let everyone know? If they were concerned it would be a target and they knew it would cause a panic then WHY DO IT AT ALL? Remember one word: PHOTOSHOP!!!

I’m sorry but this is just unforgivable. Someone needs to be fired, possibly several someones need to be fired. Consider for a moment that we are in a real economic emergency and that any wasted money by the Federal Government is a criminal act at this point. Further consider that this act endangered people’s lives in several ways. And if you don’t believe there was danger then why the military jet escorts, and consider that those folks running could have been injured from falling or have been frightened into a heart attack. Panicked people can wreck cars and run into traffic trying to get away from perceived danger.

Now ask the really big question: ‘If President Bush were in office now how would the Main Stream Media be reporting this incident?

Why is President Obama getting a pass on this? Why did he allow such an incident to happen and if he didn't truly know about this then who is the jerk he hired that was in charge of this fiasco and why isn't he fired already?

I know one thing for sure, I would like a full scale investigation into exactly who was on that plane and exactly who authorized such a stunt. And then I want them fired and ridiculed like they received a bailout bonus and spent it all on SUVs and Corporate Jets.

But 9 will get you 5 that not a peep will be uttered by this New Transparent Administration, and the public will forget about it when the MSM trumps up the next big story to draw attention away from the “empty suit” that resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

nuff said…

next subject…

Mad Dawgg

The A.P. (stands for Always Progressive) is announcing that Arlen Specter will switch parties.

OK...

A Liberal who claimed to be a Republican is going to switch the (R) after his Name to a (D)

Color me "underwhelmed"...

Seriously, Arlen Specter was not a Republican; he just played one on TV. Check his voting record, many times he votes in direct opposition to the Republican Party Platform. The only reason he stayed a Republican was they were in power and he got choice Committee assignments, now he may face harsh opposition in the Republican Primary so he runs to the other party. He's not doing it out of principle he's doing it to keep his cushy job in Washington.

Specter's Announcement has at least a grain of truth in it:

"I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania,” Specter said in a statement. "I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary."

Specter knows he has stiff opposition coming in the Republican Primary so he is switching sides in hopes he can negotiate a deal with the Democrats to secure a Primary win. We shall see if this maneuver works out for him. Hopefully it blows up in his face.

But in any case I say Farewell to the RINO Specter, at least now we get a bit of Truth in Advertising.

Here's to you Arlen:

nuff said...

next subject...

Mad Dawgg